Systems and methods for temporal subpixel rendering of image data

ABSTRACT

Methods are disclosed to render image data over time. In one embodiment, a mapping from image data values to first and second sets of subpixels in a plurality of output frames uses brightness versus viewing angle performance measures to reduce color error when the image is viewed on the display panel at an off-normal viewing angle. In another embodiment, temporal subpixel rendering is used to improve the viewing angle in LCD displays or to improve subpixel rendering in other display technologies.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser.No. 11/462,979 entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEMPORAL SUBPIXELRENDERING OF IMAGE DATA, filed on Aug. 7, 2006, which is a continuationof U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 10/379,767 entitled SYSTEMSAND METHODS FOR TEMPORAL SUBPIXEL RENDERING OF IMAGE DATA, filed on Mar.4, 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein.

The present application is related to commonly owned U.S. patentapplications: (1) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/379,766 entitled“SUB-PIXEL RENDERING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED DISPLAY VIEWINGANGLES,” published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0174375;and (2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/379,765, entitled “SYSTEMSAND METHODS FOR MOTION ADAPTIVE FILTERING,” published as U.S. PatentApplication Publication 2004/0174380. U.S. Patent ApplicationPublications 2004/0174375 and 2004/0174380 are hereby incorporated byreference herein.

BACKGROUND

The present application is related to display systems, and moreparticularly, to systems and methods for subpixel rendering source imagedata over time. Temporal subpixel rendering may be used to improveviewing angle in LCD displays or to improve subpixel rendering in otherdisplay technologies.

In commonly owned U.S. Patent Applications: (1) U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 09/916,232 entitled “ARRANGEMENT OF COLOR PIXELS FOR FULL COLORIMAGING DEVICES WITH SIMPLIFIED ADDRESSING” filed Jul. 25, 2001, andpublished as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0015110 (“the'110 application”); (2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/278, 353,entitled “IMPROVEMENTS TO COLOR FLAT PANEL DISPLAY SUB-PIXELARRANGEMENTS AND LAYOUTS FOR SUB-PIXEL RENDERING WITH INCREASEDMODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION RESPONSE,” filed Oct. 22, 2002, andpublished as U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0128225 (“the'225 application”); (3) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/278, 352,entitled “IMPROVEMENTS TO COLOR FLAT PANEL DISPLAY SUB-PIXELARRANGEMENTS AND LAYOUTS FOR SUB-PIXEL RENDERING WITH SPLIT BLUESUBPIXELS,” filed Oct. 22, 2002, and published as U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2003/0128179 (“the '179 application”); (4)U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/243,094, entitled “IMPROVED FOURCOLOR ARRANGEMENTS AND EMITTERS FOR SUBPIXEL RENDERING,” filed Sep. 13,2002, and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2004/0051724 (“the '724 application); (5) U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/278, 328, entitled “IMPROVEMENTS TO COLOR FLAT PANEL DISPLAYSUB-PIXEL ARRANGEMENTS AND LAYOUTS WITH REDUCED BLUE LUMINANCE WELLVISIBILITY,” filed Oct. 22, 2002, and published as U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2003/0117423 (“the '423 application”); (6)U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/278,393, entitled “COLOR DISPLAYHAVING HORIZONTAL SUB-PIXEL ARRANGEMENTS AND LAYOUTS,” filed Oct. 22,2002, and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2003/0090581 (“the '581 application”); and (7) U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 10/347, 001, entitled “SUB-PIXEL ARRANGEMENTS FOR STRIPEDDISPLAYS AND METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUB-PIXEL RENDERING SAME,” filedJan. 16, 2003, and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2004/0080479 (“the '479 application”), novel subpixel arrangements aretherein disclosed for improving the cost/performance curves for imagedisplay devices. The '110, '225, '179, '724, '423, '581 and '479applications are all incorporated by reference herein.

These improvements are particularly pronounced when coupled withsubpixel rendering (SPR) systems and methods further disclosed in thoseapplications and in commonly owned U.S. Patent Applications: (1) U.S.patent application Ser. No. 10/051,612, entitled “CONVERSION OF RGBPIXEL FORMAT DATA TO PENTILE MATRIX SUB-PIXEL DATA FORMAT,” filed Jan.16, 2002, and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2003/0034992 (“the '992 application”); (2) U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/150,355, entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUB-PIXEL RENDERINGWITH GAMMA ADJUSTMENT,” filed May 17, 2002, and published as U.S. PatentApplication Publication No. 2003/0103058 (“the '058 application”); (3)U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/215, 843, entitled “METHODS ANDSYSTEMS FOR SUBPIXEL RENDERING WITH ADAPTIVE FILTERING,” filed Aug. 8,2002, and published as U.S. Patent Application Publication No.2003/0085906 (“the '906 application”). The '992, '058, and '906applications are herein incorporated by reference herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in, and constitute apart of this specification illustrate exemplary implementations andembodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serveto explain principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 depicts an observer viewing a display panel and the cones ofacceptable viewing angle off the normal axis to the display.

FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of a graphics subsystem driving a panel withsubpixel rendering and timing signals.

FIG. 3 depicts an observer viewing a display panel and the possiblecolor errors that might be introduced as the observer views subpixelrendered text off normal axis to the panel.

FIG. 4 depicts a display panel and a possible cone of acceptable viewingangles for subpixel rendered text once techniques of the presentapplication are applied.

FIGS. 5 through 8 show several embodiments of performing temporalsubpixel rendering over two frames.

FIG. 9 shows two curves of brightness (100% and 50%) versus viewingangle on a LCD display.

FIGS. 10A-10E show a series of curves depicting the performance ofbrightness versus time when the response curve of a typical liquidcrystal is modulated by various pulse trains.

FIGS. 11A-11D show another series of curves of brightness versus timewith different types of pulse trains.

FIGS. 12 and 13 depict several embodiments of implementing temporalsubpixel rendering.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to implementations and embodiments,examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whereverpossible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout thedrawings to refer to the same or like parts.

FIG. 1 shows a display panel 10 capable of displaying an image upon itssurface. An observer 12 is viewing the image on the display at anappropriate distance for this particular display. It is known that,depending upon the technology of the display device (liquid crystaldisplay LCD, optical light emitting diode OLED, EL, and the like) thatthe quality of the displayed image falls off as a function of theviewing angle, but particularly so for LCDs. The outer cone 14 depictsan acceptable cone of viewing angles for the observer 12 with a typicalRGB striped system that is not performing sub-pixel rendering (SPR) onthe displayed image data.

A further reduction in acceptable viewing angle (i.e. inner cone 16) mayoccur when the image data itself is sub-pixel rendered in accordancewith any of the SPR algorithms and systems as disclosed in theincorporated applications or with any known SPR system and methods. Oneembodiment of such a system is shown in FIG. 2 wherein source image data26 is placed through a driver 20 which might include SPR subsystem 22and timing controller 24 to supply display image data and controlsignals to panel 10. The SPR subsystem could reside in a number ofembodiments. For example, it could reside entirely in software, on avideo graphics adaptor, a scalar adaptor, in the TCon, or on the glassitself implemented with low temperature polysilicon TFTs.

This reduction in acceptable viewing angle is primarily caused by colorartifacts that may appear when viewing a subpixel rendered image becausehigh spatial frequency edges have different values for red, green, andblue subpixels. For example, black text on a white background which usesSPR on a design similar to FIG. 5 will result in the green subpixelsswitching between 100% and 0% while the red and blue subpixels switchingfrom 100% to 50%.

FIG. 3 depicts the situation as might apply to subpixel rendered blacktext 30 on a white background. As shown, observer 12 experiences nocolor artifact when viewing the text substantially on the normal axis tothe panel 10. However, when the observer “looks down or up” on thescreen, the displayed data may show a colored hue on a liquid crystaldisplay (LCD), which is due to the anisotropic nature of viewing angleon some LCDs for different gray levels, especially for vertical angles(up/down). Thus it would be desirable to perform corrections to the SPRdata in order to increase the acceptable viewing angle 40 of SPR data,as depicted in FIG. 4.

Currently, red and blue image data are averaged via a SPR process tocreate the proper value on the red and blue subpixels on a display. Thisaveraging causes viewing angle problems for some liquid crystal displaysbecause the viewing angle characteristics are a function of the voltagesetting on the pixel. To smooth out the visual effects, severalembodiments disclosed herein describe a temporal method to create theaverage value such that the viewing angle is not affected by subpixelrendering. As will be discussed further below in connection with FIG.12, one embodiment takes the image data from two adjacent source pixelsand uses them sequentially frame by frame. Since the data from pixel topixel does not change dramatically, there should be no flicker observed.For sharp transitions, adaptive filtering takes over and this temporalaveraging can be turned off.

As an example, FIG. 5 shows how a “white” line can be rendered on apanel having a subpixel repeat grouping—such as grouping 50 whichcomprises red subpixels 52, green subpixels 54, and blue subpixels 56.It will be appreciated that this choice of subpixel repeat grouping ismerely for illustrative purposes and that other subpixel repeatgroupings would suffice for purposes of the present invention. Suchother subpixel repeat groupings are further described in theabove-incorporated by reference patent applications.

FIGS. 5-8 depict various embodiments of temporally subpixel rendering asingle vertical white line in order to reduce the amount of off-normalaxis color error. In Frame 1 of FIG. 5, the first three columns ofcolored subpixels are fully illuminated (as indicated by the heavyhatching lines); whereas in Frame 2 of FIG. 5, only the middle column ofgreen subpixels 54 are fully illuminated and the rest are off. If thetwo frames are switched sufficiently fast enough, then the visual effectremains a “white” line; but, as will be explained below, reduces theamount of off-normal axis color error.

FIG. 6 shows Frame 1 with the top row (first three subpixels) and onlythe bottom middle column green subpixel as fully illuminated. Frame 2has the bottom row (first three subpixels) and top middle column greensubpixel as fully illuminated.

FIG. 7 shows Frame 1 with upper left and lower right red subpixels withtwo middle green subpixels fully illuminated. Frame 2 has the lower leftand upper right blue subpixels with two green subpixels fullyilluminated.

FIG. 8 shows Frame 1 with the first two columns fully illuminated; whileFrame 2 shows the second and third columns fully illuminated. All fourFIGS. 5-8 depict embodiments of performing subpixel rendering in timethat produces for the human viewer the proper color on the normal axisviewing; while reducing the color error introduced on off-normal axisviewing—particularly for LCD displays. These combinations of ON and OFFpixels can be varied in a prescribed time sequence to minimize flicker;for example, the sequence of FIG. 5 through 8 could be repeated over 8frames of data.

For illustrative purposes, FIG. 9 depicts why these color artifactsarise. When a single “white” line is drawn as in Frame 1 of FIG. 5 andheld over time (which is typical for SPR that does not vary over time),it is centered on the middle row of green subpixels. As measured on thenormal axis, the middle column of green subpixels is fully illuminatedat 100% brightness level; the blue and the red subpixels are illuminatedat 50% brightness. Put another way, the green subpixel is operating witha filter kernel of [255] (i.e. the “unity” filter with ‘255’ being 100%on a digital scale); while the blue and red subpixels have a filterkernel of [128 128] (i.e. a “box” filter with ‘128’ being 50% on adigital scale). At zero viewing angle (i.e. normal to the display), a“white” line is shown because the red and blue subpixels are of doublewidth of the green subpixels. So with G-100, R˜50, B˜50, achroma-balaced white is produced at 100-2×(50)-2×(50). Themultiplicative factor of “2” for red and blue comes from the fact thatthe red and blue subpixels are twice the width of the green subpixels.

As the viewing angle increases to angle 0UP, then the observer wouldview a fall-off of AQ in the green subpixel brightness—while viewing aARB fall-off 902 in the brightness of either the red or the bluesubpixel brightness. Thus, at OUP, there is G′-80, R′-20, B′-20, whichresults in the image of the white line assuming a more greenish hue—e.g.80-2×(20)-2×(20). For angle Odown, the green pixels will again fall offan amount AQ, while the red and blue subpixels will actually rise anamount AR B 904. In this case, the white line will assume a magenta hue.

So, to correct for this color artifact, it might be desirable to drivethe red and blue subpixels effectively on a different curve so that thedelta fall-off in the green vs. the red/blue subpixels better match eachother as a relative percentage of their total curve. An intermediatecurve which is the average curve between 100% and 0% is shown in FIG. 9.This intermediate curve depicts the time-averaged curve that occurs ifthe red and blue subpixels are driven in Frame 1 to 100% luminance andin Frame 2 to 0% luminance. As may be seen, at the same off-normal axisangle as in FIG. 9, the difference in the fall-off between the green andthe red/blue subpixels are better matched.

Other embodiments and refinements of the above temporal subpixelrendering are possible. FIGS. 10A, B, and C are a series of threegraphs. FIG. 10A shows a typical brightness response curve of a liquidcrystal over time. FIG. 10B shows a series of pulse trains—each a widthequal to one frame and represents the voltage applied to the red andblue subpixels (e.g. for the white line example above). Thus, the redand blue subpixels are driven to 100% luminance for odd frames and 0%for even frames.

As may be seen, the response time for liquid crystals (as shown in FIG.10A) is longer than the frame time, as shown in FIG. 10B. Thus, FIG. 10Cshows the resulting brightness response of the red and blue subpixels onthe display. As with our above example, the green subpixels are drivenat 100% luminance. The average response for the red and blue subpixelsin FIG. 10C is around 20%—which does not give a chroma-balanced white;but more of a greenish hue.

To correct this color imbalance, FIG. 10D depicts one embodiment ofdrive voltages that achieves approximately 50% average brightness of thered and blue subpixels. The effect of driving the red and blue subpixelswith the pulse train depicted in FIG. 10D—that is, having two voltagesthat straddle the 50% luminance point of the red and blue subpixels—isshown in FIG. 10E. It will be appreciated that any suitable pairs ofvoltage values that substantially give the resulting luminance curve ofFIG. 10E would suffice—so the present invention is not limited to thetwo voltages depicted in FIG. 10D.

An alternate embodiment that achieves a 50% average brightness butexperiences near 100% and 0% peak luminances would improve the overallviewing angle performance because the liquid crystal has it's bestviewing angles at these two extreme luminance values. If the LC does notfully switch, then the brightness of the red and blue pixels will bewrong and color fringing will be seen. In this case, a “gain” or offsetto the pixel values can be applied so as to achieve the desiredbrightness. For example, if the pixel cannot fully switch in a frametime (−15 ms), then the average brightness (transmission) of the LCDwill be less than the average of the two pixel values. If a black towhite edge is desired, then the two values are 100% and 0% for anaverage of 50%. If, for example, the LC only switches to 50% and thengoes back to 0%, it will be necessary to multiply the two pixel valuesby 0.5 and then add 0.25. Then the two states will switch between100*0.5+0.25=75% and 0*0.5+0.25=25% for an average of the desired 50%.These gain and offset values are adjusted empirically or can becalculated; once determined, they will be the same for all panels unlessthe LC material or cell gap is changed. The color stability will not beas good as with faster responding LC material, but will be animprovement over non-temporal filtering. One may also just adjust thelower value, leaving the higher value constant. This may improve theviewing angle.

Temporal Patterns With Arbitrary Numbers of Frames

An alternative embodiment is now described that uses multiple numbers offrames to achieve the desired temporal averaging. FIGS. 11A and 11Bdepict a pulse train optimized for a certain liquid crystal performance,such as depicted in FIG. 10A (e.g. a slower rise time than fall time).FIGS. 11C and 11D depict a pulse train optimized for a liquid crystalhaving a performance curve in which the rise time and fall times aremore equal.

FIG. 11A shows a pulse train in which the voltage applied to the red andblue subpixels is 100% for two frames and 0% for one frame. FIG. 11B isthe resulting brightness. FIG. 11C shows a pulse train in which thevoltage applied to the red and blue subpixels is 100% for three framesand 0% for three frames. FIG. 11D is resulting brightness. As can beseen in both FIGS. 11B and 11D, the liquid crystal spends most of itstime at either 100% or at 0% with an average about 50%.

With either FIG. 11B or 11D, however, there is a potential for flickerin the red and blue subpixels. This potential flicker can be reduced byvarying the pulse train temporally or spatially. For example, the redand blue subpixels that are near each other on the panel can be drivenwith the same pulse train but taken at different phase from each other.Thus, the red and blue subpixels are effectively interlaced to reducethe temporal flicker effect. The same phased pulse trains could beapplied to neighboring red subpixels themselves or blue subpixelsthemselves to achieve the same result. Additionally, the pulse trainscould be designed to minimize observable flicker in other ways: (1) bykeeping the flicker frequency as high as possible; and/or (2) bydesigning the pattern to have less energy in lower frequency flickercomponents and more energy in higher frequency components.

Other embodiments of suitable pulse trains to achieve substantially thesame result can be designed to match any given liquid crystalperformance curve. For example, if the liquid crystal has a fast risetime and slow fall time then an appropriate pulse train may be 0% forframe 1, 100% for frame 2 and 3, and then repeat.

In general, by using arbitrary number of frames in anon/off-pattern-period, one can design pulse trains or patterns of ON'sand OFF's that ultimately give the correct average pixel luminance. Asdiscussed, separate patterns can be applied to each color. Thistechnique may have lower temporal resolution, but judiciously applied tostatic images, the correct amount of emitted light from a particularpixel may be realized. In the case of scrolling text, the technique mayalso be applied. Since the operator in general is not attempting to readthe text while it is moving, any temporal distortion of the text due tothe applied pattern will not negatively impact the user's experience.The patterns can be designed to provide color correction to scrollingtext.

This embodiment avoids the necessity of employing a voltage offset fromthe zero value as used in FIG. 10D to realize arbitrary values ofsubpixel luminance, thereby avoiding viewing angle and color errorproblems introduced with non-zero values. By using only full ON and fullOFF values, the performance should be similar to RGB stripe panelperformance.

Another example of a suitable pulse train is as follows: consider a fourframe pattern 1,1,1,0 (or some other arbitrary pattern) that is appliedto red and blue subpixels such that the flicker from each cancels eachother—i.e. red and blue subpixels are out of luminance phase. Greenremains unmodulated in this example. Theoretically, the output luminancewill be 75% of maximum for red and blue subpixels. However, given theasymmetry of the ON and OFF response times, the response will be lessthan 75%, approaching 50% depending on the specific LC response time.The flicker frequency will be 15 Hz assuming a 60 Hz refresh rate, butthe variations can be minimized by phasing the red and blue to canceleach other. The remaining flicker will be a fraction of the total lightdue to the proximity of a 100% green pixel, so the flicker effect willbe attenuated.

Inversion Schemes For Effecting Temporal SPR

For LCDs which are polarity inverted to achieve zero DC voltage acrossthe cell, there is an extra requirement when using temporal filtering.Usually the polarity is inverted every frame time, either row by row(row inversion), column by column (column inversion) or pixel by pixel(dot inversion). In the case of dot inversion, the polarity of theinversion either varies every row (1:1) or every two rows (1:2). Thechoice of inverting the polarity every frame is somewhat for convenienceof the circuitry; polarity can be inverted every two frames withoutdegrading the LC material. It may be desirable to invert every twoframes when temporal dithering is employed so as to not get extra DCapplied to the cell along edges. This could occur for the case withinversion every frame because some pixels may be switching 1 0 1 0 . . .; if the polarity is switching every frame, then the “1” state willalways be the same polarity.

Various Implementation Embodiments

One further embodiment for implementing a temporal SPR system is shownin FIG. 12. This embodiment assumes a panel comprising a subpixel repeatgrouping as found in FIG. 5; however, it should be appreciated thatsuitable changes can be made to the present embodiment to accommodateother subpixel repeat groupings. FIG. 12 shows only the red image data;blue data would be treated similarly. As green data in the repeatgrouping of FIG. 5 is mapped 1:1 from source image data, there is noneed to temporally process the green data. Of course, with othersubpixel repeat groupings, green data may be temporally processed aswell.

FIG. 12 shows how the red data is mapped from a source image data plane1202 to the panel data planes over frames 1204 and 1206, wherein thepanel has the layout as described above. For example, RS11 maps to RP11in Frame 1 (1204) whereas RS12 maps to RP11 in Frame 2 (1206). Thismapping effectively averages the values of RS11 and RS12 (creating theequivalent of a spatial “box” filter) and outputs the result to RP11.Similarly, RS22 will be output to RP21 in Frame 1 and RS23 will beoutput to RP21 in Frame 2.

As may be seen, red source image data 1202 may be stored in the systemor otherwise input into the system. This temporal averaging for red andblue data will result in the same visual appearance compared to an RGBstripe system; viewing angle and response time effects will be the same.It may also simplify the data processing for pictorial applications suchas camera or TV applications. This one embodiment for remapping may workwell for rendering text, but might lead to some inaccuracies in graylevels which can affect picture quality. Thus, yet another embodimentfor a remapping for images, as shown in FIG. 13, is to first average thesource pixels and then output to the panel. For example, RS11 and RS12are averaged via function 1308 and outputted to RP11 in frame 1 (1304).Then RS12 and RS13 are averaged by function 1308 and outputted to RP11in frame 2 (1306). It will be understood that function 1308 could bemore than just the averaging of two pixels and could include a morecomplex subpixel rendering process of two or more input pixels. It willalso be understood that these techniques described in FIGS. 12 and 13apply equally to all display technologies—such as LCD, OLED, plasma, ELand other pixilated color displays. For OLED and plasma in particular,the viewing angle and response time are not an issue as it is with LCD.Therefore, the primary purpose of using temporal SPR for thesetechnologies is to simplify the SPR processing—e.g. gamma adjustment isnot required.

Use of Adaptive Filtering

Adaptive filtering can be applied to decide when to use the valuesdirectly or to average them. For edges, the R and B values aretemporally averaged frame by frame, preserving the viewing angle. Fornon-edges, the adjacent values are first averaged and then outputted tothe output subpixels. Averaging adjacent image data values for edges isnot necessarily desirable because averaging would tend to blur theedge—thus making the transition less sharp. So, it may be desirable todetect where and when an edge is occurring in the image.

The averaging will make pictures slightly more accurate. Note that theaveraging goes to left pixel on odd frames and right pixel on even. Atypical algorithm is as follows (shown for red):

Odd Field:

-   -   IF ABS(RSn-RSn-1)>max THEN RP_(n)=RS_(n−1) ELSE        RP_(n)=(RS_(n)+RS_(n−1))/2 where RS is source pixel (e.g. RED)        and RP is a panel pixel and where “max” is chosen sufficient        such that an edge is occurring at this point in the image with a        good degree of probability.

Even Field:

-   -   IF ABS(RSn-RSn-1)>max THEN RP_(n)=RS_(n) ELSE        RP_(n)=(RS_(n)+RS_(n+1))/2 where RS is source pixel (e.g. RED)        and RP is a panel pixel and where “max” is chosen sufficient        such that an edge is occurring at this point in the image with a        good degree of probability.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for producing an image over time frominput source image data values for display on a display panel, thedisplay panel including a plurality of colored subpixels in at least oneof a group of a first color, a second color and a third color; the stepsof the method comprising: receiving first, second and third adjacentinput source image data values of a first color; averaging the first andsecond adjacent source image data values to produce a first averagecolor data value; averaging the second and third adjacent source imagedata values to produce a second average color data value; in a firstframe, outputting the first average color data value of the first colorto a first subpixel location on the display; and in a second framefollowing the first frame, outputting the second average color datavalue of the first color to the first subpixel location on the display.2. The method of claim 1 further including the step of determining if anedge occurs in the image where the first and second adjacent sourceimage data are displayed; and, when an edge occurs, performing theaveraging and outputting steps; and when an edge does not occur,outputting the first adjacent source image data of the first color to afirst subpixel location on the display, and in a second frame,outputting the second adjacent source image data of the first color tothe first subpixel location on the display.
 3. The method of claim 1wherein the display panel is a liquid crystal display panel.
 4. A methodof temporally rendering subpixel image data in a display systemcomprising a display panel and a subpixel rendering unit, the displaypanel comprising a plurality of subpixels for displaying an image, themethod comprising: receiving input color image data indicating an inputcolor image including at least first and second colors; performing asubpixel rendering operation to produce a first output set of subpixelsusing the input image data; the first output set of subpixels includingsubpixels indicating the first and second colors and forming a firstframe of output image data; producing a second output set of subpixelsusing the input image data; the second output set of subpixels includingsubpixels indicating the first and second colors and forming a secondframe of output image data; adjusting luminance values of selected onesof the subpixels indicating the second color in the first and secondframes of the output image data to produce adjusted luminance data; andoutputting the first and second frames of the output image data havingthe adjusted luminance data to the display in successive time periods toproduce an output image; outputting the first and second framesproducing a target luminance value in the output image for the selectedones of the subpixels indicating the second color.
 5. The method ofclaim 4 wherein the target luminance value of the selected ones of thesubpixels indicating the second color is a percentage of a luminancevalue of the subpixels indicating the first color.
 6. The method ofclaim 5 wherein the target luminance value of the selected ones of thesubpixels indicating the second color is fifty percent of the luminancevalue of the subpixels indicating the first color; and wherein the stepof adjusting luminance values of selected ones of the subpixelsindicating the second color in the first and second frames of the outputimage data to produce adjusted luminance data includes assigning aluminance value of one hundred percent in the first frame and aluminance value of zero in the second frame of the output image data. 7.The method of claim 4 wherein the display panel is a liquid crystaldisplay panel comprised of liquid crystal material operating accordingto a response time curve; and wherein the step of adjusting luminancevalues of selected ones of the subpixels indicating the second color inthe first and second frames further includes using the response timecurve of the liquid crystal material to determine the adjusted luminancedata for the selected ones of the subpixels indicating the second colorin each of the first and second frames of the output image data.
 8. Themethod of claim 7 wherein the step of outputting the first and secondframes of the output image data having the adjusted luminance data insuccessive time periods further includes using the response time curveof the liquid crystal material to determine a sequential pattern foroutputting the first and second frames to produce the target luminancevalue in the selected ones of the subpixels indicating the second color.